New Ways of Doing Business in a Recession
We are in a global recession of huge magnitude. Businesses need to adapt their businesses in order to compete. I am no exception. Few companies have endless time and money to spend on positioning and brand strategies. For smaller companies that need help but don’t have the budget, I’ve developed a new service offering for start-ups called The MINI. It delivers rapid positioning and messages in a fast, bite-sized module.
With high unemployment and job worries growing, there’s been a tremendous interest in personal branding to boost one’s career. To answer that demand, I’ve developed a series of personal branding seminars that have gotten rave reviews from the likes of the National Retail Federation, Sun, Asian Business League and SD Forum. Large companies are now asking me to do seminars for their managers and employees to help them position themselves inside and outside their companies. It’s a win-win since personal branding helps employees get ahead in their careers, and companies enjoy the benefits of their employees gaining a stronger industry reputation.
As you can see, with tectonic shifts in the business environment, there is huge opportunity. This example of how I’m leveraging change in my business is something every business can and must do.
Let me know how your business has taken advantage of the down economy to innovate and adapt.
Why Refresh a Brand?
Once you have a brand, with your visual branding, messages and reputation, why change it? If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. However, for many of us, our branding may not work as well for us over time.
I’m a case in point. My consulting business has evolved over the years, but my site and my overall branding has not kept pace with the changes. I am due for a brand refresh. Energy Energy Design has just created a beautiful logo (see image above) and website redesign for me that keeps a design resemblance to my old stuff but makes it much more contemporary. The Spring Agency has helped me with my digital properties, including designing a digital video and making my website more interactive, with real-time feeds from Twitter in addition to my regular blog posts. Stay tuned for the website relaunch.
I’m still all about positioning and brand strategies. But, I wanted my website to reflect the new environment in which we are doing business. Today, customers want to have a relationship with you even if they are just window-shopping. When they come to your site, they want to see a human face, hear a human voice, read words that real people would say.
My brand refresh has many elements that work together. The refresh is meant to reinforce my reputation as a Silicon Valley brand strategist, create a more engaging experience for my website visitors and enable me to add value in new areas. Here’s a sneak peek of the work in progress [new blog posts are coming soon]:
The site will be live in about a week. So what do you think? Are the messages compelling? Is the redesign attractive and in keeping with my business focus? Can’t wait to hear from you!
Tom Minick, former CEO of The QuickSilver Group
“Karen provided me with invaluable positioning and branding advice for my company both in its infancy and following our acquisition. Her advice on positioning was one of the key reasons for our success, enabling us to achieve an industry leadership position with minimal marketing expense. She is absolutely TERRIFIC and the model for high leverage consulting. Five star recommendation!!!”
Nader Fathi, CEO, SigmaQuest
“Karen understood the complexities of our high-tech market and was able to provide creative leadership on how to maximize our potential in the market. She has great expertise and a winning formula for providing high value add in a short amount of time.”
Ryan Yoo, Global Sales and Marketing Director, Park Systems
“Karen provided Park Systems with invaluable strategy advice which helped us to focus and be more successful in our marketing and sales efforts. She has an excellent framework for strategy development and consensus. We were highly impressed with the quality of her work.”
Joe Flynn, CEO, Lavante
“Karen did an awesome job in helping us identify and articulate a compelling positioning and brand strategy. She has a great methodology that delivers not only the answers but consensus around them-no small feat in an entrepreneurial company with smart, opinionated people. She is a high-energy consultant whose trademark process is fast, efficient and ofhigh value. I’d hire her again in a heartbeat.”
Seymour Duncker, CEO, iCharts
“We hired Karen to help us define and articulate our strategy at a critical juncture of our start-up: post launch and pre-institutional funding. Karen was absolutely critical in helping us make the transition from a company with an impressive product to a company with a serious business model. Karen helped us articulate and frame a clear vision and powerful value proposition. Her efforts immediately started translating into both new customer revenues coming in and accelerated investor funding. Karen not only uses a great methodology to shape the thought process of the team, she adapted her process on the fly to the dynamics, characteristics and specifics of the team. Karen is an invaluable asset to have on board!!! We are extremely grateful to her (and envious to everybody else hiring Karen :)”
John Kelly, CEO, BlackStone Discovery
“Karen Kang delivered incredible results for my business. Karen assessed our needs, created a tailored plan for our team, and then nailed every single step of the process. Karen brings a great depth of knowledge and experience to the table, and molds it to fit your business needs. We walked away from the engagement with a clear path for our company and a solid strategy for our management team. We hired Karen to lead the next step of our project and have been thrilled every since.”
Be the Brander-In-Chief
Too many CEOs leave branding up to their marketing or branding staff. Company marketers can develop visual branding and brand campaigns, but the CEO must be involved when deciding what the brand means. That is, the core values of the brand, what the brand should be associated with, and the personality and character of the brand. The CEO is the company’s most visible representative of the brand, therefore, the CEO and the brand strategy must be aligned.
Walk, Talk and Live the Brand
As the CEO, you must ensure that the brand represents the company’s core values, and that the entire company walks, talks and lives the brand. The company brand can be a wonderful motivator, empowering employees to think creatively about how their jobs further the brand experience for customers, partners and all other stakeholders. But the message must be clear. And it must come from the top. To have a successful brand, you must be the Brander-in-Chief.
How Important is a Good Brand Name?
“What’s in a name? That which we call a rose
By any other name would smell as sweet.”
–Juliet in Romeo and Juliet, William Shakespeare
In theory, Juliet is right. However, perceptions and associations create a filter through which we experience a name. For instance, Hewlett-Packard (HP) as a name would not rank high on anyone’s list of creative company names, but the company brand is so strong that the name is evocative of quality, performance and innovation. The same could be said for IBM. But, if you don’t have experience with a brand, the name might take on more importance. Would you want to have your computer repaired by the SpaceCadets (which connotes being absent-minded, and is a company name I just invented) or The Geek Squad (which connotes organized tech nerds, and is an actual brand service name of Best Buy).
Brand Names that Connote What They Do
I like the name Invisalign because in the context of orthodontics, it instantly connotes a technology that helps to straighten or align your teeth in an invisible manner. In the early 1980’s, I helped to position and launch the company, Maxtor, which sounded like maximum storage—exactly what the company was doing in hard disk drives.
Intuit, which is a leader in personal and small business financial software, has a name that instantly lets you know that their products are easy-to-use with an intuitive interface. Their flagship product names do an excellent job of evoking their category or benefits: Quicken, QuickBooks and TurboTax.
Genentech is the granddaddy brand in genetic engineering, but now there are myriad genetic engineering companies with names like Amgen, Biogen, Genzyme and Xoma. In the end, however, the performance of the company and their products will determine whether users, partners or investors equate the brand name with something positive and meaningful.
Brand Names that Evoke the Company Personality
During the hey day of the dot com era, having a dot com-sounding name seemed very important to emerging companies and their investors. We saw the rise (or fall) of Yahoo!, Google, Inktomi, eBay, Boo.com, Pets.com, Kozmo.com, GoDaddy and many others. Since companies were trying to appeal to consumers with a unique personality and experience, it didn’t seem to matter if the name sounded unprofessional and verged on goofy. The result of exposure to so many dot com names is that the world is much more tolerant of non-business-sounding names, and seems to equate innovation with name originality.
Brand Names that Don’t Help the Cause
I recently ran into the company name Achaogen on the Internet, and my first reaction, was “How do you pronounce this thing?” and my second question was “What on earth do they do?” They make genetically engineered products that help to prevent drug resistance. The name definition, which they provide on their home page, states that “A” stands for “against” and “chao” stands for randomness or chaos, therefore, their name means against randomness or genetic diversity. What if you don’t have a website or a person to explain what this company does? You fend for yourself. In this case, I thought the name evoked an idea of chaos, which is not necessarily a positive in my book. Without explanation, I would say that the name Achaogen doesn’t leave a great first impression.
What Happens During a Merger or Acquisition?
In April 2004, FedEx unveiled the brand for its acquisition of Kinko’s copy centers as FedExKinko’s, including a new multi-colored icon known as the beacon. Now, four years later, the company has retained the beacon symbol but jettisoned the Kinko’s name; FedExKinko’s is now known as FedEx Office, not a stimulating name but it doesn’t need to be with the strength of the FedEx brand. That FedEx retained the Kinko’s brand name for four years is testament to the strength of the brand that Kinko’s had built over the years with its customers.
An old but interesting example of when not to ditch the acquiree’s name is NCR, formerly the National Cash Register Company. In the 1990s, AT&T became the parent of NCR and changed NCR’s name to AT&T Global Information Solutions (GIS). In one fell swoop, the history and associations of 110 years was whisked away and in its stead was a non-descript name that got confused with Geographic Information Systems (GIS). Although NCR had its share of problems, its reputation for competence as a computing company was a lot stronger than AT&T’s. AT&T should have left NCR’s name alone. To make a long story short, NCR is now an independent, publicly traded company, that is somewhat going back to its roots through innovations in the area of retail self-service. [Postscript: Although AT&T ceased as a company, SBC/Cingular relaunched their company under a new AT&T brand in 2005, a smart move given that AT&T is one of the most recognized global brands.]
What Makes a Good Brand Name?
We’ve seen a number of examples of what works and what doesn’t work in a brand name. But, if you are faced with naming or renaming a company or a product, what should be the key considerations? Granted, there are brand considerations beyond just the desired attributes that I will be listing below. For instance, FedExKinko’s was an awkward, slapped-together name, but it made sense at the time because it was important to leverage the equity of two strong brands.
With that caveat, here is my list of six attributes for a good brand name:
1) DISTINCT. The best brand names are made up words that are stand out from the crowd in a positive way.
2) CONCISE. A one- or two-syllable name is easier to remember than a multi-syllabic name.
3) LOOKS AND SOUNDS GOOD. Remember my example of Achaogen? It doesn’t look or sound good. Besides that, who can remember how to spell it?
4) STARTS THE POSITIONING PROCESS. Intuit certainly sets you on the path thinking that the product is simple and intuitive.
5) NO NEGATIVE MEANINGS. The classic name fiasco was the launch of the Chevrolet Nova in Spanish-speaking countries, where the name of the car meant “doesn’t work” in Spanish.
6) INTERNET DOMAIN NAME AVAILABLE. In our web-saturated culture, we expect good companies to own their own Internet domain. I look askance at companies that have a .net (if they are not a network-related business) or .biz after their domain because it has a second-tier connotation that they weren’t creative enough to come up with an original .com name or they are not Internet-savvy enough to know that it is important.
In the end, a name is only one part of your brand. The list of companies that have overcome less-than-ideal brand names is long (IBM, Smuckers, Harley-Davidson, Allis Chalmers, AFLAC, to name but a few). The most important way to ensure a strong brand is to deliver on your brand promise. In short, a great brand experience that makes customers keep coming back is more important than an ideal brand name. Basically, that’s what Shakespeare meant when he wrote: “A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.” But if you can have both, you’re just that much ahead of the game. So happy naming!

